Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce bLIP numbers in lightning-liquidity documentation #3510

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tnull
Copy link
Contributor

@tnull tnull commented Jan 8, 2025

Recently, LSPS0, 1, and 2 were upstreamed as bLIP-50, 51, and 52, respectively.

Here, we

  1. start linking to the bLIPs instead of the LSP spec repository, which is likely going to be deprecated.
  2. start consistently citing the specs as LSPSX / bLIP-5X to avoid any confusions and to potentially initiate a process in which the LSP specs will over time get referred to by their bLIP number rather than their LSPS number (especially given that any upcoming specs by the LSP spec group will directly be drafted as bLIPs going forward).

Recently, LSPS0, 1, and 2 were upstreamed as bLIP-50, 51, and 52,
respectively. Here, we

1. start linking to the bLIPs instead of the LSP spec repository, which
   is likely going to be deprecated.
2. start consistently citing the specs as `LSPSX / bLIP-5X` to avoid any
   confusions and to potentially initiate a process in which the LSP
   specs will be referred to by their bLIP number rather than their LSPS
   number (especially given that any upcoming specs by the LSP
   spec group will directly be drafted as bLIPs going forward).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant